Issue and Opponent: In 1968, the U.S. war against Vietnam created frustration among the anti-war veterans and the anti-war movement. This put the spotlight on the U.S. for the use of Napalm. This chemical would stick to the skin and cause horrible burns on a person’s body. During 1963 and 1973, the use of Napalm was highly used and dropped by U.S. military officials. Dilemma Action: On April 10, 1968, two anti-war activists, Steve Kiyoshi Kuromi and Michael Crisafi, created a horrible scenario in Philidelphia, United States where they would napalm a dog. Because they announced that this would take place, thousands of people showed up to this demonstration outraged about the dog. The goal of this demonstration was to give Americans an idea of what was happening during the war and advocate for the unnecessary use of Napalm. By switching the roles of humans and dogs it would give people a sense of humanity and help them see the harm that Napalm has created to those affected by Napalm during the war. Outcome: When people showed up to express their disagreement the two activists announced that they were not going to napalm a dog. They wanted people to understand that if they were that outraged about a dog being Napalmed then what difference does it make when the U.S. is napalming people during the war?